📄 Case Report by Dr. Varada Arora & Dr. Pooja Gupta — Copy text or download as PDF.

Threatened Early Pregnancy Loss Due to Subchorionic Hematoma: When Bleeding Threatens Viability

A case report of threatened abortion with subchorionic hematoma at 9 weeks gestation, successfully managed with conservative care and progesterone supplementation.

Case Report

📋 Patient Presentation

A 35-year-old female with a history of infertility treatment, gravida 1 para 0 at 9 weeks of gestation, presented with vaginal spotting for the past 10 days. The bleeding was described as painless, fresh, off and on, with minimal spotting and occasional clots. She also reported nausea, vomiting, and general physical weakness.

She had been treated with oral ovulogens after 1 year of marriage and did not receive any luteal phase support (LPS). Neither partner had other medical conditions.

Patient Evaluation

Physical Examination

On examination, she was hemodynamically stable with stable vital signs. She used a regular sanitary pad once daily, indicating light bleeding. General examination showed mild pallor, with no icterus, cyanosis, clubbing, or edema.

  • Abdominal exam: Soft, non-distended; uterus not palpable; no tenderness
  • Speculum exam: Minimal fresh bleeding in vault, bright red and scanty; cervix healthy and pink with closed external os
  • Bimanual exam: Uterus size consistent with 8–10 weeks, soft (Hegar's sign present); cervix firm and closed; fornices free and non-tender

Investigations

Transvaginal ultrasound revealed a single live intrauterine pregnancy with CRL measuring approximately 8 weeks and 5 days and FHR of 170 bpm. A small subchorionic hematoma (SCH) of 4.2 cc volume was present. The cervical internal os was partially open (~8 mm), with the external os closed and cervical canal ~35 mm long.

InvestigationResult
Serum β-hCGAppropriate for gestational age
Hemoglobin / WBC / PlateletsNormal; no leukocytosis
Urine routineNormal
Serum progesterone15 ng/mL
TSH / FBS / RBSWithin normal limits

Differential Diagnosis

Based on the history, examination, and investigations, the following diagnoses were considered:

  • Missed abortion
  • Inevitable abortion
  • Incomplete abortion
  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Molar pregnancy
  • Local cervical causes

Final Diagnosis & Management

⚕️ Final Diagnosis

Threatened abortion with subchorionic hematoma (SCH)

The patient was managed conservatively with expectant care and prescribed:

  • Folic acid
  • Alpha-lipoic acid (600 mg/day — 300 mg twice daily)
  • Dydrogesterone 30 mg/day
  • Close monitoring with follow-up ultrasound

She was counselled regarding the potential risks and instructed to return immediately for heavy bleeding, severe abdominal pain, or fever.

Outcome

A follow-up ultrasound at 2 weeks showed a single live embryo within a well-formed intrauterine gestational sac with appropriate choriodecidual reaction. CRL was 37 mm (~10 weeks 4 days ± 4 days); embryonic cardiac activity was normal at 164 bpm. The cervical os was closed.

Her bleeding gradually subsided, and subsequent ultrasounds confirmed a healthy pregnancy without further issues.

Discussion

Threatened abortion, or threatened miscarriage, occurs when vaginal bleeding with or without cramping develops in early pregnancy while the cervix remains closed. It is the most common complication of early pregnancy and is often associated with considerable anxiety and emotional stress. It occurs in approximately 20% of recognized pregnancies, and about half of these cases ultimately end in miscarriage.

Threatened miscarriage results from partial detachment or bleeding of the decidua or chorion while the pregnancy remains viable. Common mechanisms include subchorionic hemorrhage and disruption of the implantation process. In some women, inadequate luteal function and low progesterone levels may impair decidualization and myometrial quiescence, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding and subsequent pregnancy loss.

📌 Possible Causes of Threatened Miscarriage

  • Chromosomal abnormalities
  • Immunological dysfunction
  • Endocrine disorders (diabetes, PCOS, thyroid disease)
  • Uterine or cervical abnormalities
  • Infections (bacterial, viral, parasitic, fungal, STIs)

Risk Factors:
  • Previous miscarriages (≥2)
  • Maternal age >34 years
  • Smoking and alcohol consumption
  • History of ART (IVF, embryo transfer, artificial insemination)
  • Exposure to environmental toxins; low folic acid levels

Diagnosis

Clinically, threatened miscarriage is diagnosed in women with first-trimester bleeding, a closed cervical os, and ultrasound evidence of a viable intrauterine pregnancy. Key investigations include:

  • Serial serum β-hCG to assess trends
  • Progesterone levels (<10 ng/mL indicates higher risk of miscarriage)
  • Baseline hemoglobin/hematocrit, blood group and Rh status
  • Transvaginal ultrasound to confirm FHR, CRL, GSD, and SCH

Subchorionic Hematoma (SCH)

SCH is defined as a blood collection between the chorion and uterine wall, commonly associated with first-trimester bleeding and threatened abortion. It occurs in approximately 18–22% of pregnancies and is a common cause of first-trimester bleeding.

SCH GradeSize Relative to Gestational SacRisk
Small<10–20% of GSLower risk
Medium20–50% of GSModerate risk
Large>50% of GSHigher risk of loss/preterm labor

SCH detected at ≤7–8 weeks is associated with higher pregnancy loss rates than later detection (e.g., 19.6% vs. 3.6% when detected ≤7 vs. >8 weeks).

Predictive Ultrasound Findings

FindingCutoffPrognosis Impact
Absent FHRNo cardiac activityImminent miscarriage
Low FHR<100–113 bpm17–30% miscarriage risk
Small GSD<15 mmPoor viability
Small CRL<19.9–22 mmHigh risk of progression to loss
Irregular sac wallsIrregular shapeIncreased miscarriage odds
Large yolk sacAbove cutoff diameterComplications if persists
SCHLarge perigestational hemorrhageGrade/GA-dependent risk

An FHR >113 bpm, CRL >19.9 mm, and GSD >27.3 mm predict continuation to 28 weeks with 98% specificity and 99% positive predictive value.

Management of Threatened Abortion

Most cases are managed expectantly on an outpatient basis after excluding ectopic and nonviable pregnancy. Patients should be advised to return if bleeding increases, pain worsens, or tissue is passed, and repeat ultrasonography is indicated if symptoms persist.

⚠️ Return Immediately If:

  • Heavy bleeding or passage of large clots
  • Severe abdominal pain or shoulder-tip pain
  • Dizziness, syncope, or fever
  • Foul-smelling vaginal discharge

Routine bed rest has no proven benefit and is not recommended, although patients may limit strenuous activity. Sexual abstinence is often advised, but evidence that it influences miscarriage risk is limited.

Progesterone Therapy

The 2018 Cochrane review (including PRISM and PROMISE trials) suggests that vaginal micronized progesterone modestly increases live birth rates in women with threatened miscarriage, particularly in those with a history of prior pregnancy losses, while its routine use in first-time threatened miscarriage without previous losses remains debated.

📋 Progesterone Regimens

  • NICE guideline: Vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily from onset of bleeding until 16 weeks — for women with confirmed IUP and history of miscarriage
  • Oral dydrogesterone: 40 mg stat followed by 10 mg three times daily — supportive evidence, commonly used in India
  • FOGSI 2024: Dydrogesterone well tolerated; therapy individualized based on prior history and risk factors
  • In RPL: Progesterone considered essential, started early at adequate doses, continued until 12–16 weeks

Other Medications

Treatment options beyond progesterone that may be considered in selected cases:

  • Analgesics: Paracetamol (choice for pain); NSAIDs generally avoided in early pregnancy
  • Tranexamic acid: Small studies suggest benefit in controlling bleeding and resolving SCH; not routinely guideline-endorsed
  • Alpha-lipoic acid: May reduce bleeding, pain, and hematoma size when added to progesterone (7–12 weeks); evidence limited to small non-blinded studies
  • Antibiotics: Not routinely indicated; safer agents (penicillins, cephalosporins) only for confirmed genital or UTI
  • Hydroxychloroquine: In APS with RPL not responding to aspirin + LMWH — improves live birth rates
  • Low-dose aspirin + LMWH: Standard in APS or inherited thrombophilia with prior pregnancy loss
  • Corticosteroids: Reserved for active autoimmune disease; not for threatened miscarriage alone
  • hCG: Not recommended as standard therapy; Cochrane review does not support routine use
  • Thyroxine: Only for documented hypothyroidism
  • IVIG: Not routine; reserved for selected RPL cases in specialized settings

Special Considerations

Threatened Abortion in IVF Pregnancies

In IVF pregnancies, diagnostic evaluation is similar but monitoring is generally more intensive because of higher risks of miscarriage, multiple gestation, placental complications, and preterm birth. Earlier and more frequent ultrasound assessments, including SCH surveillance, are recommended. Early cervical length assessment (around 14 weeks) and closer monitoring for preterm birth may be required.

Prevention of Alloimmunization

Alloimmunization in threatened miscarriage is prevented by timely administration of anti-D immunoglobulin to unsensitized RhD-negative women:

  • Minimum 250 IU before 20 weeks
  • 500 IU at or beyond 20 weeks
  • Ideally within 72 hours of bleeding episode (some benefit up to 10–13 days)

Clinical Pearls

🔑 Key Clinical Points

  • Threatened miscarriage is a diagnosis of exclusion in pregnant patients with viable pregnancies and vaginal bleeding symptoms
  • Subchorionic hematomas are linked to threatened miscarriage, with larger hematomas increasing the risk of early pregnancy loss
  • Initial steps when evaluating bleeding in early pregnancy: determine location of pregnancy, then assess viability using ultrasound
  • Patients with heavy vaginal bleeding need evaluation for hemorrhagic anemia, often signaling early pregnancy loss
  • Serum progesterone may help predict outcomes; 35 nmol/L (11.0 ng/mL) proposed to predict low/high risk for miscarriage
  • Most cases can be managed in the outpatient department with close follow-up and ultrasound
  • Oral dydrogesterone effectively treats threatened miscarriage, especially in Indian clinical practice

Test Your Knowledge

Q1. What is the risk of pregnancy loss in threatened abortion with a viable fetus and closed cervix?

  • A. <10%
  • B. 10–20% ✓
  • C. 20–30%
  • D. >50%
Answer: B. With fetal cardiac activity and a closed cervical os, most pregnancies continue successfully. Miscarriage risk is generally limited to about 10–20%.

Q2. In threatened abortion, which ultrasound finding is a poor prognostic sign?

  • A. CRL appropriate for GA
  • B. Bradycardia (<90 bpm) in FHR ✓
  • C. Closed cervical os
  • D. Thickened endometrial stripe
Answer: B. Fetal bradycardia in early pregnancy is associated with impaired embryonic viability and significantly increased risk of miscarriage. The lower the FHR, the poorer the prognosis.

Q3. What is the recommended management for a stable patient with threatened abortion and viable fetus?

  • A. Hospital admission for IV fluids
  • B. Emergency uterine evacuation
  • C. Expectant management with possible progesterone ✓
  • D. Immediate referral for caesarean section
Answer: C. Most women are managed conservatively with observation and follow-up. Progesterone may be offered, particularly in women with previous pregnancy losses.

Q4. Which maternal factor is highly associated with increased risk of threatened abortion?

  • A. Multiparity
  • B. Maternal obesity
  • C. Smoking ✓
  • D. Use of folic acid
Answer: C. Smoking adversely affects placental function and fetal oxygenation, increasing the risk of vaginal bleeding and early pregnancy loss. Smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged.

Q5. Which is the most accurate indicator of embryonic demise on ultrasound in early pregnancy?

  • A. Absence of FHR when CRL >7 mm ✓
  • B. Yolk sac size >5 mm
  • C. Empty GS at 4 weeks
  • D. Subchorionic hematoma
Answer: A. A CRL >7 mm without detectable cardiac activity is a definitive sonographic criterion for early pregnancy failure and embryonic demise.

References

  1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 26th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2022.
  2. Mouri MI, Hall H, Rupp TJ. Threatened miscarriage. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026.
  3. Murugan VA, Murphy BO, Dupuis C, et al. Role of ultrasound in the evaluation of first-trimester pregnancies in the acute setting. Ultrasonography. 2020;39(2):178–89.
  4. Lu L, Li J, Zhou Y, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine for threatened miscarriage. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:1–26.
  5. Hendriks E, MacNaughton H, MacKenzie MC. First-trimester bleeding: Evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(3):166–74.
  6. Barnhart KT, Simhan H, Kamelle SA. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound above and below the beta-hCG discriminatory zone. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(4):583–7.
  7. RCOG. Green-top Guideline No. 25: The management of early pregnancy loss. 2021.
  8. Yurong Cao, Weiwei Li, Linna Ma. Assessment of the prognostic value of CA125 for miscarriage risk in patients with threatened abortion. PLOS One. 2025;20(6):e0326384.
  9. Heller HT, Asch EA, Durfee SM, et al. Subchorionic hematoma: Correlation of grading techniques with first-trimester pregnancy outcome. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(7):1725–32.
  10. Practice Committees of ASRM and SREI. Diagnosis and treatment of luteal phase deficiency. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(6):1416–23.
  11. Wahabi HA, Fayed AA, Esmaeil SA, et al. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(8):CD005943.
  12. FOGSI. Key practice points 2024. Management of women with threatened miscarriage. Available from https://www.fogsi.org
  13. Petca A, Bot M, Maru N, et al. Benefits of α-lipoic acid in high-risk pregnancies. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(5):1232.
  14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200: Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(5):e197–e207.
About the Authors: Dr. Varada Arora, MBBS, MS, IVF Specialist, and Dr. Pooja Gupta. This is Case 19 from the book Difficult to Treat: Implantation Failure to Early Pregnancy Loss. Content is intended for educational purposes. Individual clinical decisions should always be made in consultation with a qualified healthcare provider.

Questions About Early Pregnancy Loss?

Dr. Varada Arora provides specialized care for threatened miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, and high-risk IVF pregnancies.